In SAP MM ECC6.0, you have a Purchase Order of 1500 pc of a material. The Go-down have done 3 separate goods receipt of 600, 400, and 200 consecutively. Later, when the invoice matching was done with reference to the purchase order number, the system recommended to match against 2 lines of 400, 200 only.
Deduce the correct scenario.
(more than one answers)
(A) Goods receipt of the first 600 was cancelled
(B) The Purchase order line was with type “GR-based invoice”
(C) The Purchase order line was with type “GR non-valuated”
(D) An invoice verification for the first 600 pc was already done earlier.
(E) The line for the 200 was unplanned.
.
Deduce the correct scenario.
(more than one answers)
(A) Goods receipt of the first 600 was cancelled
(B) The Purchase order line was with type “GR-based invoice”
(C) The Purchase order line was with type “GR non-valuated”
(D) An invoice verification for the first 600 pc was already done earlier.
(E) The line for the 200 was unplanned.
.
Since there are only 2 lines showing a line 400 and another of 200, it seems it is from the GR results. And there is a missing line of 600. This would mean the following:
ReplyDelete. the GR of 600 was subsequently cancelled
. the GR of 600 was already invoiced
. it is the GR-based IV scenario