In SAP PM the differences between use of PM02 and PM03 for external maintenance work procurement in the Maintenance Order are the following except ?
(more then one answers)
A) The same Item Category is used in both types of Purchase Documents.
B) A different Account Assignment is used in the Purchase Documents.
C) Completion of the approved services done are always represented by a Material document.
D) Both scenario can perform invoice verification with reference to Service Entry Sheet.
E) In Both scenario, Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order can be created before the Maintenance order is Released.
.
(more then one answers)
A) The same Item Category is used in both types of Purchase Documents.
B) A different Account Assignment is used in the Purchase Documents.
C) Completion of the approved services done are always represented by a Material document.
D) Both scenario can perform invoice verification with reference to Service Entry Sheet.
E) In Both scenario, Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order can be created before the Maintenance order is Released.
.
Answer: B,D
ReplyDeleteA) PM02's item category is " " (blank or standard) while PM03's item category is "D" (services)
ReplyDeleteB) Both PM02 and PM03 uses the same Account Assignment "F" (Orders)
C) PM02 uses the MIGO (Goods Receipt Transaction) to complete the order resulting in a material document. PM03 however uses ML81N (Service Entry Transaction) to complete resulting in a Service Entry Sheet and after approval of the entry sheet, a material document is created. Hence we can same that the final results of completion of PM02 and PM03 are still represented via a Material Document.
D) For PM02, the LIV process can only refer to PO, DO or BOL while for the PM03 scenario, the LIV process can refer to PO or Service Entry Sheet.
E) PM02 and PM03 do not control when Purchase Requisition or Purchase Order to be created.