In SAP MM, which of the following statements about the standard Material type configurations are correct ?
(more then one answers)
A) It is possible for material type UNBW to have an MRP view for Consumption-Based-Planning.
B) It is not necessary for material type NLAG to have an Accounting view or Storage view.
C) Material type ROH and FERT are configured with both Qty and Value update in all valuation areas.
D) The Material type HAWA will have both Sales and Purchasing data views possibility.
E) MRP data view is available for Material type HAWA.
.
Answer: A, B, C, D, E
ReplyDeleteMaterial UNBW may not need an Accounting View. As UNBW material are managed as Qty without value, stock management is possible. As such all good issue are also recorded in the consumption history. All these characteristics allow the material to be planned by MRP either using Consumption Based Planning or Explosion-Based MRP.
ReplyDeleteMaterial NLAG are materials without Qty and without Value. It is expensed off at Goods Receipt without the need for Stock management. therefore the Storage view is not necessary, it is obvious an Accounting view is not necessary as such material is not managed by value at Goods Receipt.
ReplyDeleteA basic understand of SAP delivered material type is desirable.
ReplyDeleteROH=Raw Material, FERT=Finished Goods, HAWA=Trading
The characteristics of these standard Material Types can be found in the Customzing of Material Type in IMG-Logistics General or t-code OMS2